Polymers Used in Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems

Document Type : compile

Author

Biomedical Engineering Group, Chemical Engineering Faculty, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Mucoadhesive polymers were first used in the early 1980s to design mucoadhesive
buccal drug delivery systems. These systems have been introduced as novel drug
delivery systems due to the ability to stick and stay on mucus membranes and slow release of
the drug and as suitable alternative to overcome the problems of common oral drug delivery
systems. Mucoadhesive systems can be prepared in various forms, such as tablet, gel, oral
film, spray, viscous solution and micro/nanoparticles, and can be used for drug delivery
from the buccal, sublingual, intestine, ocular, nasal, vaginal, and other mucosal routes.
Mucoadhesive polymers which are the most important component of the drug delivery
systems, are usually natural, synthetic or semi-natural hydrophilic macro-molecules,
containing functional groups forming hydrogen bonds, such as carboxyl and hydroxyl
groups, or amines. Hence, mucoadhesion depends on the reaction between the polymer and
the mucus and the adhesion strength is determined by the different polymer characteristics
and the medium conditions in which the polymer resides. In this article, the discussion
covers mucoadhesion mechanism and its effective factors; natural mucoadhesive polymers,
synthetic and semi-natural mucoadhesive polymers; the properties and characteristics of
these polymers; their application in the design and development of mucoadhesive systems
and also the new generation of mucoadhesive polymers such as thiolated mucoadhesive
polymers.

Keywords

Main Subjects


1. Khutoryanskiy V., Advances in Mucoadhesion and Mucoadhesive Polymers, Macromol. Biosci., 11, 748–764, 2011.
2. Makhlof A., Werle M., and Takeuchi H., Mucoadhesive Drug Carriers and Polymers for Effective Drug Delivery, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol., 18, 375–386, 2008.
3. Kumar V., Gupta A., Kumar R., Jaideep S., and Kumar B., Mucoadhesive Polymers: Means of Improving the Mucoadhesive Properties of Drug Delivery System, J. Chem. Pharm. Res., 2, 418–432, 2010.
4. Rajaram D. and Laxman S., Buccal Mucoadhesive Films: A Review, Sys. Rev. Pharm., 8, 31–38, 2017.
5. Shaikh R., Singh T., Garland M., Woolfson A., and Donnelly R., Mucoadhesive Drug Delivery Systems, J. Pharm. Biol. Sci., 3, 89–100, 2011.
6. Miller N., Chittchang M., and Johnston T., The Use of Mucoadhesive Polymers in Buccal Drug Delivery, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 57, 1666–1691, 2005.
7. Sudhakar Y., Kuotsu K., and Bandyopadhyay A., Buccal Bioadhesive Drug Delivery-A Promising Option for Orally Less Efficient Drugs, J. Controlled Release, 114, 15–40, 2006.
8. Sosnik A., Neves J., and Sarmento B., Mucoadhesive Polymers in the Design of Nano-Drug Delivery Systems for Administration by Non-Parenteral Routes, Prog. Polym. Sci., 39, 2030–2075, 2014.
9. Elzoghby A., Gelatin-Based Nanoparticles as Drug and Gene Delivery Systems: Reviewing Three Decades of Research, J. Controlled Release, 172, 1075–1091, 2013.
10. Rezaie F., Soroushnia A., and Ganji F., Study on Different Polymers Applicable as Oral Films, Polymerization (Persian), 5, 3–17, 2015.
11. Nappinnai M., Chandanbala R., and Balaijirajan R., Formulation and Evaluation of Nitrendipine Buccal Films, Indian J. Pharm. Sci., 70, 631–635, 2008.
12. Sanjay P. and Sawant K., Development, Optimization and in vitro Evaluation of Alginate Mucoadhesive Microspheres of Carvedilol for Nasal Delivery, J. Microencapsul., 26, 432– 443, 2009.
13. Russo E., Selmin F., Baldassari S., Gennari C., Caviglioli G., Cilurzo F., Minghetti P., and Parodi B., A Focus on Mucoadhesive Polymers and Their Application in Buccal Dosage Forms, J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol., 32, 113–125, 2016.
14. Taghizadeh M., Sadeghi M., and Ganji F., Chitosan and Its Microparticles As Carriers in Drug Delivery Systems: An Overview, Polymerization (Persian), 6, 4–19, 2016.
15. Kockisch S., Rees G., Young S., Tsibouklis J., and Smart J., In Situ Evaluation of Drug-Loaded Microspheres on a Mucosal Surface Under Dynamic Test Conditions, Int. J. Pharm., 276, 51–58, 2004.
16. Kamel A., Ashri L., and Alsarra I., Micromatricial Metronidazole Benzoate Film as a Local Mucoadhesive Delivery System for Treatment of Periodontal Diseases, AAPS Pharm. Sci. Technol., 8, 184–194, 2007.
17. Mahdizadeh Z., Emam Z., Mortazavian E., Rafiee N., Behmadi H., Rafiee M., and Moosavi A., Determination of Diffusion Coefficient for Released Nanoparticles from Developed Gelatin/ Chitosan Bilayered Buccal Films, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 112, 1005–1013, 2018.
18. Lim S., Martin G., Berry D., and Brown M., Preparation and Evaluation of the in vitro Drug Release Properties and Mucoadhesion of Novel Microspheres of Hyaluronic Acid and Chitosan, J. Controlled Release, 66, 281–292, 2000.
19. Thirawong N., Kennedy R.A., and Sriamornsak P., Viscometric Study of Pectin–Mucin Interaction and Its Mucoadhesive Bond Strength, Carbohydr. Polym., 71, 170–179, 2008.
20. Kaur A. and Kaur G., Mucoadhesive Buccal Patches Based on Inter Polymer Complexes of Chitosan–Pectin for Delivery of Carvedilol, Saudi Pharm. J., 20, 21–27, 2012.
21. Yehia A., El-Gazayerly O., and Basalious E., Fluconazole Mucoadhesive Buccal Films: in vitro/in vivo Performance, Curr. Drug Dev., 6, 17–27, 2009.
22. Repka M. and Mcginity J., Physical–Mechanical Moisture Absorption and Bioadhesive Properties of Hydroxypropyl
Cellulose Hot-Melt Extruded Films, Biomaterials, 21, 1509– 1517, 2000.
23. Repka M., Gutta K., Prodduturi S., Munjal M., and Stodghill S., Characterization of Cellulosic Hot-Melt Extruded Films Containing Lidocaine, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 59, 189– 196, 2005.
24. Attia M., El-Gibaly I., Shaltout S., and Fetih G., Transbuccal Permeation, Anti-Inflammatory Activity and Clinical Efficacy of Piroxicam Formulated in Different Gels, Int. J. Pharm., 276, 11–28, 2004.
25. Nafee N., Ismail F., Boraie N., and Mortada L., Mucoadhesive Delivery Systems. II. Formulation and in-vitro/in-vivo Evaluation of Buccal Mucoadhesive Tablets Containing Water-Soluble Drugs, Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 30, 995–1004, 2004.
26. Suneela P., Manek R., Kolling W., Stodghill S., and Repka M., Solid-State Stability and Characterization of Hot-Melt Extruded Poly(ethylene oxide) Films, J. Pharm. Sci., 94, 2232–2245, 2005.
27. Kraisit P., Limmatvapirat S., Luangtana M., and Sriamornsak P., Buccal Administration of Mucoadhesive Blend Films Saturated with Propranolol Loaded Nanoparticles, Asian J. Pharm. Sci. (AJPS), 13, 34–43, 2018.
28. Mojarad S., Kabiri K., and Motasadizadeh H., Acrylic Microgels: Preparation and Application, Polymerization (Persian), 7, 71–81, 2017.
29. Sakuma S., Sudo R., Suzuki N., Kikuchi H., Akashi M., and Hayashi M., Mucoadhesion of Polystyrene Nanoparticles
Having Surface Hydrophilic Polymeric Chains in The Gastrointestinal Tract, Int. J. Pharm., 177, 161–172, 1999.
30. Consuelo I., Falson F., Guy R., and Jacques Y., Ex-Vivo Evaluation of Bioadhesive Films for Buccal Delivery of Fentanyl, J. Controlled Release, 122, 135–140, 2007.